Pharma BD Deal Intelligence

Sanofi-Aventis / BiPar Sciences, Inc.

2009 · Acquisition/Merger · $500M · Complete

A $500M bet on iniparib as a PARP inhibitor for triple-negative breast cancer that collapsed entirely: the Phase III trial missed both endpoints in 2011, later trials failed too, and Sanofi wrote off $285M in 2013 after learning iniparib was never actually a PARP inhibitor.

CALLED IT — OFF BY 21

Total loss: iniparib was never actually a PARP inhibitor, failed every subsequent Phase III/II trial, and was fully written off for $285M in 2013.

Full analysis, sources & comparables →

The coverage arc

Apr 15, 2009 Fierce Biotech Neutral

A board member called it 'a landmark transaction for 2009,' but the article noted analysts view the deal as a 'long-term gamble' with financial benefits…

Jan 27, 2011 Fierce Biotech Bearish

Sanofi's iniparib (BSI-201), the centerpiece of the BiPar acquisition, flunked its Phase III triple-negative breast cancer trial, missing co-primary endpoints…

Jan 01, 2014 JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute Bearish

'Downfall of Iniparib: A PARP Inhibitor That Doesn't Inhibit PARP After All' — the asset Sanofi bought from BiPar lacked characteristics typical of the PARP…

Source summaries from our enrichment pipeline; follow links for originals.

All 7 sources with sentiment breakdown →

Sanofi-aventis agreed to acquire BiPar Sciences for up to $500M, contingent on milestones, to gain the PARP inhibitor BSI-201 (iniparib) in oncology.

Did it work? Outcome assessment

Total loss: iniparib was never actually a PARP inhibitor, failed every subsequent Phase III/II trial, and was fully written off for $285M in 2013.

Strategic verdict
Failed to Achieve

Key facts

Disease & market context

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

48K US cases/yr

Disease Overview

Triple-negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptor expression, making it unresponsive to endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies. It accounts for roughly 15-20% of breast cancers, disproportionately affects younger women and Black women, and historically relied on cytotoxic chemotherapy with poor outcomes in metastatic disease.

Competitive Landscape

In April 2009, the metastatic TNBC standard of care was chemotherapy backbones (taxanes, anthracyclines, gemcitabine/carboplatin) with no targeted therapies approved. AstraZeneca's olaparib and Abbott/Enzon's veliparib were earlier in development; KuDOS/AstraZeneca had not yet reported the BRCA-mutant breast cancer data that later defined the PARP class. BiPar's BSI-201/iniparib, then believed to be a PARP inhibitor, had reported eye-catching Phase 2 data showing median OS extension from 7.7 to 12.2 months when added to gemcitabine/carboplatin in metastatic TNBC, framing it as potential first-in-class. Sanofi paid up to $500M to access this asset just as Roche's Avastin was struggling in breast cancer and the targeted-TNBC space was wide open. The deal collapsed when Phase 3 data in January 2011 missed both OS and PFS, and subsequent mechanistic work in 2012 showed iniparib did not actually inhibit PARP — it nonselectively modified cysteine residues. Sanofi terminated development at ASCO 2013, taking a $285M charge. True PARP inhibitors (olaparib/Lynparza, talazoparib/Talzenna) ultimately validated the class in BRCA-mutated TNBC.

Related deals — scored

DealYearValueOutcome
Sanofi-Aventis / BiPar Sciences, Inc. (this deal)2009$500M8
Sanofi-Aventis / Symbion Consumer (Primary Health Care)2008$544M71
Sanofi-Aventis / Merial Limited (Merck's 50% interest)2009$4.0B65
Sanofi-Aventis / Acambis plc2008$548M36
Sanofi-Aventis / Shantha Biotechnics Limited2009$784M34
Sanofi-Aventis / Fovea Pharmaceuticals SA2009$541M23
Sanofi-Aventis / ImmunoGen Inc.2005$18M

Compare all 7 side-by-side →

See the full interactive analysis, sources & comparables →