Pharma BD Deal Intelligence

Gilead Sciences Inc. / Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

2020 · Co-Development · $5.0B · Complete

A $5.05B collaboration built entirely on Arcus's anti-TIGIT thesis, and that thesis collapsed: both Phase 3 trials (STAR-221, STAR-121) were stopped for futility, and Gilead let its option period lapse in 2026 rather than continue. Arcus is left refocusing on an unproven HIF-2a inhibitor.

WRONG BY 47 POINTS
Full analysis, sources & comparables →

The coverage arc

May 27, 2020 BioPharma Dive Bullish

Gilead Sciences is paying $375 million in cash and $200 million in equity for a 10-year option-based partnership with Arcus Biosciences covering the company's…

May 27, 2020 STAT News Bullish

Gilead Sciences will pay up to $5 billion to access a portfolio of next-generation cancer drugs from Arcus Biosciences, including a closely-watched anti-TIGIT…

Dec 08, 2023 Fierce Biotech Neutral

Gilead and Arcus continue to differentiate their domvanalimab anti-TIGIT program from Roche's failed tiragolumab and Merck's mixed vibostolimab readouts,…

Source summaries from our enrichment pipeline; follow links for originals.

All 18 sources with sentiment breakdown →

Gilead Sciences and Arcus Biosciences entered a 10-year collaboration to develop and commercialize next-generation immuno-oncology therapies. Gilead paid $375M upfront and made a $200M equity investment, with up to $4.475B in option exercise fees and milestone payments. The deal covers Arcus's pipeline of anti-TIGIT (domvanalimab), anti-PD-1, anti-CD73, and other IO assets. This was a partnership with an equity stake (later ~33%), not an acquisition. The anti-TIGIT thesis subsequently collapsed: the Phase 3 STAR-221 (upper GI) study was discontinued for futility in December 2025 and STAR-121 (1L NSCLC) was discontinued for futility in April 2026. On April 20, 2026 Gilead declined the option-continuation payment, ending its option period on July 14, 2026 and forgoing options to Arcus's CCR6/CD89/CD40L programs while retaining existing options on AB801, AB598, AB102 and a TNF inhibitor. Arcus has refocused on its wholly-owned HIF-2a inhibitor casdatifan (Phase 3 PEAK-1 in ccRCC).

Key facts

Disease & market context

NSCLC, GI Cancers, Solid Tumors (TIGIT/PD-1/CD73 Combinations)

236K US cases/yr · $175.0B Global oncology therapeutics market 2020 · ~$5.05B Total deal BD value (incl. $375M upfront + $200M equity + up to $4.475B option/milestones)

Disease Overview

The Gilead-Arcus 10-year collaboration covers a broad next-generation immuno-oncology pipeline spanning anti-TIGIT, anti-PD-1, anti-CD73, anti-CD39, and anti-A2aR adenosine receptor programs across NSCLC, gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer. NSCLC affects approximately 236,000 new U.S. patients per year (American Cancer Society 2020), with PD-(L)1-eligible Stage IV non-squamous adenocarcinoma representing roughly 70% of incident cases. Colorectal cancer affects approximately 148,000 new U.S. patients annually with the metastatic MSS subset (~85%) representing the IO-resistant unmet need where TIGIT and adenosine pathway combinations are being explored. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma affects ~57,000 patients annually with historically poor checkpoint response, an area where anti-CD73 small molecules like quemliclustat are being tested in combination with chemotherapy backbones. Anti-TIGIT antibodies like domvanalimab represent the most-watched combination class in PD-1-anchored IO franchises after Roche/Genentech's Phase 2 CITYSCAPE NSCLC data lifted the field in early 2020. Anti-CD73 small molecules and antibodies disrupt the adenosine immunosuppression axis. WAC pricing for branded checkpoint inhibitors ranges $13K-15K per month with treatment durations of 1-3 years for responding patients.

Competitive Landscape

The next-generation IO competitive landscape is the most contested space in oncology. Anti-TIGIT antibodies are led by tiragolumab (Roche/Genentech, Phase 3 SKYSCRAPER program in NSCLC, gastric, esophageal — multiple Phase 3 failures by 2022 reset class expectations), vibostolimab (MK-7684, Merck Phase 3), ociperlimab (BeiGene Phase 3), domvanalimab (AB154, Arcus/Gilead Phase 3 ARC-7/ARC-10), and AGEN1777 (Agenus). Anti-CD73 includes oleclumab (MEDI9447, AstraZeneca), quemliclustat/AB680 (Arcus), and uliledlimab (I-Mab). Anti-A2aR (adenosine receptor) includes ciforadenant (CPI-444, Corvus) and etrumadenant (AB928, Arcus). The anchor PD-(1)/PD-L1 backbone remains pembrolizumab (Keytruda Merck), nivolumab (Opdivo BMS), atezolizumab (Tecentriq Roche), and durvalumab (Imfinzi AstraZeneca). Gilead's TIGIT-anchored bag now competes most directly against the Roche/Merck/BeiGene Phase 3 stacks, with domvanalimab differentiating on Fc-silent design (versus Fc-active tiragolumab/vibostolimab) — a thesis subject to ongoing clinical debate after multiple TIGIT Phase 3 failures.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (IO Combinations)

200K US cases/yr · $30.0B Global NSCLC Market (2024)

Disease Overview

NSCLC (~85% of lung cancer). IO dominates first-line. Gilead/Arcus collaboration targets next-gen IO combos (domvanalimab anti-TIGIT + zimberelimab anti-PD-1).

Competitive Landscape

Merck (Keytruda $25B+), AZ (Tagrisso $5B+, Imfinzi), BMS (Opdivo). Anti-TIGIT class has had mixed results (Roche tiragolumab failed).

Pancreatic Cancer

64K US cases/yr · $3.0B Global Pancreatic Cancer Market (2024)

Disease Overview

Worst prognosis of major cancers. Chemotherapy backbone with limited IO/targeted options. Novel combinations the next frontier.

Competitive Landscape

BMS (Abraxane), Ipsen (Onivyde), generic FOLFIRINOX. KRAS G12D programs in development. Significant unmet need.

Deal timeline

Related deals — scored

DealYearValueOutcome
Gilead Sciences Inc. / Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (this deal)2020$5.0B46
Gilead Sciences Inc. / Pharmasset Inc.2011$11.2B98
Gilead Sciences Inc. / Triangle Pharmaceuticals Inc.2002$464M96
Gilead Sciences Inc. / CymaBay Therapeutics2024$4.4B76
Gilead Sciences Inc. / Nurix Therapeutics Inc.2019$2.3B69
Gilead Sciences Inc. / Immunomedics Inc.2020$21.0B68
Gilead Sciences Inc. / Kite Pharma, Inc.2017$11.9B67

Compare all 7 side-by-side →

See the full interactive analysis, sources & comparables →