Pharma BD Deal Intelligence
Failed to Achieve: Pfizer's roughly $174M acquisition-date bet on antisense candidate EXC-001 for skin scarring produced positive Phase 2 data and a 2018 published study, yet the renamed PF-06473871 never reached approval or a product launch.
Three Phase 2 trials showed EXC-001 produced highly significant 24-week scar improvement vs placebo on Physician Assessment (p<0.001), Subject Assessment…
Pfizer to pick up antisense firm Excaliard, an Isis spinout developing EXC 001 for excessive skin scarring; terms were undisclosed though contingent milestone…
The article presents the deal facts and market opportunity for Excaliard's anti-scarring drug neutrally, citing Pfizer's stated strategy to complement its…
Source summaries from our enrichment pipeline; follow links for originals.
All 9 sources with sentiment breakdown →
Pfizer acquired Excaliard for undisclosed upfront plus contingent payments. Isis (now Ionis) entitled to up to $14M as a former licensor. Deal added EXC-001 antisense fibrosis candidate to Pfizer pipeline. Below clear $250M threshold per public terms but strategically notable platform deal.
Assessment window: 5yr post-close.
$4.0B US annual cost of managing hypertrophic scars (estimate)
Hypertrophic scars and other fibrotic dermal lesions are raised, often pruritic and disfiguring scars that result from over-production of CTGF-driven collagen during wound healing. They are common after surgery, burns, and trauma, disproportionately affect young patients and darker skin types, and have no FDA-approved pharmacological cure — current management relies on intralesional steroids, silicone, pressure therapy, laser, and surgical revision.
At deal time (Nov 2011), there was no FDA-approved drug for excessive skin scarring; standard of care was intralesional triamcinolone, silicone gel sheeting, pressure garments, pulsed-dye laser, cryotherapy, and surgical revision — all device/procedural or off-label. Differentiated Rx pipelines were thin: Renovo's Juvista (avotermin, anti-TGF-β3) had failed Phase 3 in early 2011, vacating the lead biologic position; RXi Pharmaceuticals' RXI-109 (self-delivering RNAi against CTGF) was just entering Phase 1; Promedior's PRM-151 was focused on systemic fibrosis. EXC-001 (later renamed PF-06473871) entered Pfizer with positive Phase 2 data — a 24-week reduction in scar severity on Physician Assessment (p<0.001), Subject Assessment (p=0.003), and Expert Panel VAS (p<0.001). The deal handed Pfizer a Phase-2-validated antisense oligonucleotide against CTGF, with Isis (now Ionis) entitled to up to $14M plus future royalties. Pfizer subsequently de-prioritized the program; EXC-001 did not advance to approval, and CTGF inhibition has since been pursued in systemic fibrosis (e.g., FibroGen's pamrevlumab in IPF/DMD) rather than dermal scarring.
| Deal | Year | Value | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfizer Inc. / Excaliard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (this deal) | 2011 | — | 18 |
| Pfizer Inc. / BioNTech SE | 2020 | $748M | 100 |
| Pfizer Inc. / FoldRx Pharmaceuticals | 2010 | — | 99 |
| Pfizer Inc. / Medivation Inc. | 2016 | $14.0B | 86 |
| Pfizer Inc. / Wyeth | 2009 | $68.0B | 86 |
| Pfizer Inc. / Warner-Lambert Company | 2000 | $90.0B | 83 |
| Pfizer Inc. / Arvinas, Inc. | 2021 | $2.4B | 77 |
← Browse all deals · How we score deals
More: 2011 deals · Pfizer Inc. deals · Dermatology deals