Pharma BD Deal Intelligence
Novartis's $750M STING bet collapsed on the data: after $200M upfront and a dedicated immuno-oncology group, Phase 1b results showed only ~10.4% ORR for ADU-S100 plus spartalizumab, and Novartis pulled the program in 2019 on efficacy, not safety.
Outcome grade pending — assessed 5 years post-close.
Full analysis, sources & comparables →Endpoints framed Novartis's December 2019 termination of ADU-S100 as 'the latest in a long line of setbacks' for Aduro after the $750M 2015 alliance — a clear…
Aduro disclosed Novartis 'removed ADU-S100 (MIW815) from its portfolio based on clinical data generated to date,' explicitly noting the decision was not driven…
Published Phase 1b data confirmed ADU-S100 + spartalizumab achieved only ~10.4% ORR with no expansion cohorts opened — independent peer-reviewed validation of…
Source summaries from our enrichment pipeline; follow links for originals.
All 5 sources with sentiment breakdown →
Novartis and Aduro entered an up-to-$750M global cancer immunotherapy collaboration targeting the STING pathway. Aduro received $200M upfront plus equity investment with up to $500M+ in milestones plus royalties; the partners co-developed STING agonists with Novartis launching a new immuno-oncology research group. Novartis later terminated work on STING program (2019).
2M US cases/yr
Solid tumors collectively account for the majority of the ~2.0M annual US cancer diagnoses (NCI SEER). Despite checkpoint-inhibitor success in subsets (melanoma, NSCLC, RCC, MSI-H), most patients either fail to respond or progress, motivating efforts to convert 'cold' (non-T-cell-inflamed) tumors to 'hot' through innate-immune activation. The STING pathway — Stimulator of Interferon Genes — was a leading target hypothesis for this conversion, intended to broaden checkpoint-responsive populations.
At the 2015 deal signing, the immuno-oncology landscape was anchored by Bristol Myers Squibb's Opdivo and Yervoy, Merck's Keytruda, and Roche's Tecentriq (approved 2016), with PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy already showing the durable-but-narrow response problem that STING agonists were designed to address. The competing STING agonist programs included Merck/IFM Therapeutics (MK-1454, later acquired via the 2019 IFM Due deal worth up to $2.3B), GSK/Spring Bank (SB 11285), and BMS-986301. ADU-S100 was the most-watched program given Aduro's first-mover position, the $750M Novartis commitment, and the Glenn Dranoff-led Novartis IO research group launched alongside the deal. The Phase 1b ADU-S100 + spartalizumab combination ultimately delivered only ~10.4% ORR with no clear dose-response, leading Novartis to drop the program in December 2019 (Endpoints News: 'the latest in a long line of setbacks'). Aduro's stock crashed 40%+ on the June 2019 ASCO update and another 14% on Novartis's December exit. The franchise was eventually written off; Aduro merged with Chinook Therapeutics in 2020. The deal is now a benchmark cautionary tale for high-priced upfronts on novel immuno-modulatory mechanisms with limited clinical de-risking. Sources: https://endpts.com/after-taking-a-hard-look-at-the-data-novartis-punts-aduros-sting-drug-the-latest-in-a-long-line-of-setbacks/ ; https://aacrjournals.org/clincancerres/article/29/1/110/711972/Combination-of-the-STING-Agonist-MIW815-ADU-S100
| Deal | Year | Value | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis AG / Aduro Biotech, Inc. (STING pathway program) (this deal) | 2015 | $750M | — |
| Novartis AG / Advanced Accelerator Applications S.A. | 2017 | $3.9B | 98 |
| Novartis AG / Endocyte, Inc. | 2018 | $2.1B | 96 |
| Novartis AG / Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d. | 2002 | $876M | 88 |
| Novartis AG / GlaxoSmithKline plc | 2014 | $16.0B | 81 |
| Novartis AG / PTC Therapeutics Inc. | 2024 | $2.9B | 80 |
| Novartis AG / Chinook Therapeutics Inc. | 2023 | $3.5B | 78 |
← Browse all deals · How we score deals
More: 2015 deals · Novartis AG deals · Oncology deals